Which Way
So the proper course of action is Impeachment or Appeal, when dealing with bad judicial decisions and/or a bad judge? Well for a century or so the public has come to understand that the proper course of action is via an appeal. After all, the idea of why an appeal court is even necessary is due to the prevailing concept and persuasion that circuit judges in an appeal court are a cut above in comparison to lower court judges. After all, circuit court judge roles are few and far between. Even more to the point is that circuit judges, as part of the confirmation process, are scrutinized to a much greater degree than lower court judges. There might be good reason for such scrutiny as the appeal court is the last stop in terms of civil rights in the United States.
Wait but what about the United States Supreme Court? What about it? It exists and perhaps unbeknownst to the public, this court is a discretionary court. In short, the United States Supreme Court hears less than 1% percent of the cases filed in its court, which it has complete discretion to choose among such filings -- most of which come in the form of a Writ of Certiorari. Of the 1% of cases that the United States Supreme Court hears -- 99.99% of those cases are [federal/state] government related and the remainder -- big corp outfits. So to say that the United States Supreme Court is a political outfit would be somewhat of an understatement.
The United States Supreme Court, according to the Constitution is a co-equal branch of government – so it alleges when convenient; but, the record shows that the United States Supreme Court is much more about appearances than substance. Who is the current leader of the United States Supreme Court? That would be Chief Justice John Roberts – a Republican who some tend to believe is more or less the deciding vote in the court given his history of selectively deciding against expected views on certain cases, thereby casting the appearance as being impartial.
At the end of the day, though, when presented with the quandary of how to deal with judges who are clearly out of line and even engage in criminal conduct, Justice Roberts would say the proper course of action is via an appeal, since the upstanding courts can and will adhere to the Constitution and render impartial decisions. That sounds really good, like a well crafted well paid for public relations script. So let's hear what Chief Justice Roberts, more recently, has to say about impeachment -- the mere thought of which is taboo, since judges are in reality superior and above the law. But wait, aren’t judges part of a co-equal branch of government. OK. If you say so.
Quote:
“Roberts, a member of the U.S. Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority, rebuked Trump for his impeachment call. Roberts said an appeal, not impeachment, was the appropriate response when disagreeing with a judge's decision.” Reuters
So whats the big deal? Justice Roberts advocates the courts correcting its errs. But what about when the courts intentionally rigg cases and engage in criminal cover ups: Then what?
That is exactly what occurred in the attached brief, below, in the 9th Circuit court of Appeals. The Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et. al., did not even appear since the judge(s) {Donna M. Ryu (chief magistrate judge) and James Donato (President Barack Obama appointed district judge)} pleaded for the non-appearing defendant(s) -- which is a crime in of itself. Then the lower court judges claim that Well Fargo Bank, N.A. is not a citizen of California and thus not subject to the jurisdiction of Northern District of California federal court, despite the same defendant(s) embroiled in a derivative class action fraud case in the exact same court opened a mere months before the underlying case below.
Let’s call this what it is – a corrupt court system in a far left district which was and is more than eager to do the bidding of big corps and make cases go away. The proper venue was in San Francisco, CA – which is a predominately White venue with very far left leaning politics. The case; however, was moved to the Oakland venue (from the beginning) which is known to be a Black controlled district with, also, very far left leaning politics from a Black perspective and to benefit that group.
Piecing together the facts: Why was a San Francisco, CA defendant case moved to Oakland, CA, at the outset, which ultimately led to the most egregious level of judicial corruption ever seen on this end? No one knows. And what about the appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals? The case magically disappeared – how/why so? Even more so, who stood to gain from this conduct: The Trump Administration or the Biden Administration holdovers? And we know plaintiff did not benefit albeit surely the defendant(s) did so benefit. And what about ‘Black Ops,’ where does that enter the picture, if at all? And what about the role of the United States Supreme Court engaging in one or more acts of [a] criminal cover up(s) related to an intertwined Writ of Certiorari (from a Florida action involving a President Trump appointed district judge Roy K. Atwater) which it refused to file – despite its own Rules? Now, again, the United States Supreme Court only hears 1% of cases (Writs mostly) but according to their own Rules they are required to file Writs which they refused to do. Did Chief Judge Roberts know about or direct that course of action?
So let’s ask Justice Roberts: What is the proper course of action – Impeachment or Appeal?