Department of Justice Pattern and Practice of Non Compliance of Freedom of Information Act Request Statutory Requirements

Standard of Non-Compliance

To say that the Department of Justice has a double standard, with respect to compliance of the law especially when it applies to them, is a tremendous understatement -- to say the least. The photographs of the transcribed hearing held on April 18, 2023 show that the Department of Justice via the Federal Bureau of Investigation, flat out lied on the record and under oath, as to the scope of the Freedom of Information Act Request, therein alleging that:

1. They needed more information to understand what exactly was being requested, such as to perform a search;
2. That the FOIA request was vague or unclear;

The Department of Justice, later into the hearing, goes on to say:

1. There, allegedly, was a "No records response," to the expedited appeal;
2. And perhaps the most damaging of all, admitting that there was no search for records until about thirty days before the hearing i.e. March 18, 2023, despite the case being opened for nearly two (2) years prior and the original FOIA request at least two (2) years old.

Even the court acknowledged that:

1. The Department of Justice's response(s) (was)were contrary to what the statute requires.

And against this backdrop, the district judge (Black Obama appointed judge) denied the preliminary injunction, along with every other request, via plaintiff, thereby effectively acting in cahoots with the Department of Justice, via the Federal Bureau of Investigation, with respect to a criminal charge i.e. Obstruction of Justice. Clearly, these transcript files show that the Law does not apply to the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which, now, both are run by President Trump appointees. How is that explained? What is the position of JudicialWatch of the Red Team leaders, now?

Take a look at the six (6) pages (photographs) of the transcript below, the remaining pages of which are available on the court docket. And the original Freedom of Information Act Request which the Department of Justice and/or the Federal Bureau of Investigation, lied about as being "vague" or "unclear," can be found alongside the video addressing the ongoing bad faith and criminal cover up of the FBI.

The hearing transcript tells the story of the double standard of justice in the Department of Justice.

House Committee on the Judiciary

And for those individuals, particularly, yearning for insight, the House Committee on the Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, has known about the very serious issues of the FBI and the Eastern District of New York for years; but, has done nothing. Why not? The simple answer is right before your eyes if you choose to accept it,  House Committee on the Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan talks out of both sides of his mouth and at the end of the day Chair Jim Jordan is a puppet and patsy to President Trump. These GOP Republicans are the largest concerted fraud group in politics. They use their white christian god alleged affiliation to mask their own public corruption behind a very thin veil of "god." And what's worse, is that people believe the lies and rhetoric. 

Now, keep in mind, the quote by another republican Congressman Tom McClintock shows how these white supremacist republicans have no regard for anything except them, the preservation of their wealth, the preservation of their power, all of which glued together via raising their white christian god in your face whenever questioned. The most visible yet overlooked fact, as to plaintiff's legal complaints, over the course of two (2) years in New York City is that all of plaintiff's legal actions were presented via In Forma Pauperis. Not a single solitary person has ever leveraged In Forma Pauperis status in the federal courts for as long as plaintiff with, collecively, more than $40 million USD in unpaid damages, which the crooked United States Federal Courts hide and cover up because (according to the so-called judges) they don't want a litany of other litigants playing copy cat using plaintiff's cases as a template to do the same. This judicial posture makes no sense given not a single solitary pro se plaintiff has ever been shown to even remotely demonstrate plaintiff's extremely broad litigation experience at the federal level and in several state courts i.e. California, Georgia, etc. The fact of the matter is that these courts are directed and driven by white supremacists who decide, in the background, the outcome of a given case; what the public is allowed to see in the foreground is merely theater for the masses.