Journalism plays a critical function in a civilized society with respect to maintaining proper checks on the abuse of power and spotlighting actors who otherwise believe they are above the law.

Content Search

Biden's Ethiopian Temporary Protected Status Terminated

The federal first circuit court of appeals, which is a liberal circuit - albeit nowhere nears a radical and sideways as the 9th circuit (California) and the 2nd circuit (New York) - has determined enough is enough with the Biden Era unified Ethiopian party and allows the Trump administration to terminate the TPS status, first granted in 2022 to literally thousands of Ethiopians. It might, also, be worth noting that district judge Brian E. Murphy is a Biden appointed judge.

Basically the plaintiffs e.g. African Communities Together, et al., brought a smorgasbord of discrimination claims, which is quite typical and customary of the far left. All except one claim, their claim of Equal Protection, were dismissed. African Communities Together, et al., alleges that the Trump administration's TPS termination is based upon racial animus. Wow. Talk about the "Pot calling the kettle Black." Ethiopians are themselves largely racists. That is confirmed and factual. This ethnic group is tribal, engages near exclusively with people who like them - even while its own ethnic group oppresses them -- rather than engaging with others of different race and ethnicity backgrounds who might be of the same mindset of non-conformists - which are extremely few and far between. That by definition is racist or at least brings one's intelligence into question. But fret not the far left liberal Caucasian woman is there to advance the Equal Protection dubious claim and any other race victim claim for Ethiopians.

First off, lets take a look at the following excerpt from the court:

“"Ethiopia faces armed conflict in multiple regions of the country resulting in large-scale displacement” and “severe climatic shocks exacerbating humanitarian concerns over access to food, water, and healthcare.""

Does anything jump out and catch attention? How about the fact that the plaintiff's are "African Communities Together, et al.," in the USA as opposed to "African Communities Together" in Africa. Would it not make sense to be "Unified" or "Together" in your native country before expanding such unity externally? Sure it would, unless you are in a civil war as is the case with Ethiopia, yet Ethiopians actively discriminate against other people and ethnic minorities. This is called tribalism at all costs. Expect an uptick in marriage visa fraud as an end run around the looming deportation situation with Ethiopians.

In any event, the analysis of judge Murphy as to the Equal Protection claim in not sound. And Legalhotwater predicts that this could and likely will provoke a showdown in the Supreme Court. The foundation of Judge Murphy's allowance of the Equal Protection claim to proceed is as follows:

"[T]he Supreme Court’s decision in Mullin was decided under a likelihood of success standard based on only public statements.  The Supreme Court did not decide that the plaintiffs had failed to state a plausible claim for relief.

This is what Legalhotwater dubs as a liberal loophole. There is no real analysis of the claim itself; but, rather attaching itself to a Supreme Court decision that indirectly provides support for allowing the claim by proffering that the Supreme Court did not decide the matter in Mullins. Expect this to resolved in the Supreme Court.

For now, thousands of Ethiopians are subject to deportation. For those who are affected by this dismissal Order and do not have an Equal Protection claim at issue, the Biden free money party is over and its time to head back to Ethiopia. Conversely, Canada favors reverse racism, evident by numerous court proceedings seeking to extinguish Canada's African only and first policies, which have landed Canada in hot water economically. Even worse, the USA has been calling for sanctions on Canada for sponsoring immigration related fraud which affects Canada's banking system as well as its national security - both of which the USA alleges could and likely will affect the USA's economy and national security. It that a bit of overreach for the USA? Well technically yes; but, it does bring to light Canada's even worse systemic race problems favoring Africans, which at least some would say is a direct, if not the direct, contributing factor to Canada's tight lipped discussions on its sluggish economic state which in reality is at least a mild recession. Like what else can be expected when Canada supports race based social politics and policies which cause the hemorrhaging of cash flows while throwing job creators under the bus to advance the image Canada wants to project as being so Human Rights friendly? Which image just is not so. At least not for those who are not African. Lastly, for all of the USA's ill politics, divide, and weaponized government, at least it seeks to undo the Buddy Biden era of quasi-open borders, whereas Canada, conversely, doubles down on failed immigration policies which have caused and continue to cause economic downturn with no uptick in sight in the near future.

The first circuit's Order is available below.