USA Supreme Court Clears Way for Democrats Socialism Train

Intro:

The USA supreme court weighs in on the Trump administration’s bid to restrict conveyance of birthright citizenship to children born in the USA by parents unlawfully present within its borders.

All Aboard the Socialism Train

The supreme court just released its decision on the current Trump administration’s bid to curtail birthright citizenship conveyed on children from parents illegally or unlawfully present in the USA. The court of public opinion is out partying like its 1999 or New Year’s Eve in July, considering the USA Supreme Court just handed the far left socialist, hook or by crook (preferably by crook) democrats a guarantee that they will ride the wave as career politicians, thanks to the supreme court's gift of a virtually unlimited base of illegal or unlawfully present voters converted to citizens simply upon birth of their children in the USA.

Take for example the current situation ongoing, since the president Biden era.  One of the parents can enter the USA, pregnant, and have that child born in the USA, a few months later, then obtain birthright citizenship conveyed on the child, as now ratified by the supreme court. That may not sound like an issue to most far left liberals; but the kicker really is: How can such citizenship be conveyed on a newborn child without a defacto conveyance on the parents? This is what you call gaming the immigration system, which is that to what Buddy Biden opened the doors, since ascending into office in 2020.

Let’s take a look at what exactly the Supreme Court had to say on the matter:

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizen- ship Clause.  Pp. 2–26.” Supreme Court Opinion.

This is absolutely ludicrous. The far left frat party and flip-floppy “I wanna be loved” Justice Roberts (GOP) signed off on this nonsense. Did any of these justices actually attend law school or even bother to read the USA Constitution to which they allege to have allegiance? You guessed it. Nope. Actually reading the Constitution, alongside the context in which it is written, takes too much time and cognitive capability for the far left democrat socialism wing of the supreme court. After all, the democrat party’s motto is to rape the treasury’s coffers to feed their base, since everyone is entitled to feel good, a million dollar bank account, and a big house. Conversely, once, again, though you can count on Justice Thomas to be on point with the reality of the real legal question, superb interpretation based upon the facts, and proper context of the citizenship issue from its origin. Let’s take a look.

“After the Civil War, the Reconstruction Congress overruled Dred Scott, first with the Civil Rights Act of 1866, then with the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Both the Civil Rights Act and the Citizenship Clause guaranteed citizenship to persons born and domiciled in the United States regardless of their race.  Neither guaranteed citizenship to persons who were not domiciled in the United States.

Blacks were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans. They had no other homeland, owed no allegiance to any foreign power, and were subject to no other authority. They “fought and bled in the same battles,” “gained and gloried in the same victories,” and were “liable to be called upon to defend [America] in time of war” alongside every other citizen. Life and Writings of Frederick Douglass 256, 266 (P. Foner ed. 1950) (Douglass).” Justice Thomas

That’s not all – hold on to your hats:

“the Court cannot grant relief to any party without a right of action. See Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, 595 U. S. 30, 52 (2021) (THOMAS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). But, it grants relief here on the basis of a suit brought under the Citizenship Clause, the INA, and the APA.  The Citizenship Clause and the INA’s equivalent, by their terms, create no right of action.  The APA authorizes suits challenging “final agency action,” but the plaintiffs did not allege any final agency action. See 5 U. S. C. §704; Bennett v. Spear, 520 U. S. 154, 177–178 (1997).” Justice Thomas

Baby Baby

Can someone call in the Harvard big guns to help the far left hook and crook socialist wing of the Supreme Court comprehend the foregoing?

What we have here is Justice Thomas showcasing the make believe jurisprudence of the democrat party, which in this case flagrantly sought to graft the original citizenship issue, which dealt with Blacks being excluded from citizenship as a result of flagrant racism, into the present day scenario of every illegal and/or unlawfully present couple from South America (and everywhere else), now being enabled entry into the USA with their pregnant wife – who could have carried the child 8 months outside of the USA, then upon entry into the USA for the last month of the pregnancy term – give birth and voila here is your citizenship card, and assortment of freebies (preferably permanent freebies if the democrats have their way – such as to earn lifetime loyal voters) all on government’s dime.

It might be worth noting that the same government coffers are well into $37 trillion USD upside down. No worries though, when the treasury coffers run empty the democrats will simply seize the assets of the wealthy – you know: the builders, creators, innovators, and forward progressive intellectuals to hand over such assets to the democrat's base of “I’m entitled to a million dollar house too because we are all human.” By definition this is hyper radical socialism that is going to get ugly - very very ugly - before it is over.

This paradigm shift did not begin in 2025 under this current Trump administration; but, rather under then president Biden. The GOP and conservatives in general have been in a losing battle, since president Biden entered office. And the GOP have no one to blame but themselves as they played politics knowing the economic and social death trap president Biden was cultivating. The GOP could and should have impeached Biden, but they played politics and allowed the current paradigm shift to take place, and since then the GOP, along with conservatives, have been losing ever since -- with no real wins in sight. This climate of hyper politics on steroids is a major contributor to the exodus out of the USA. The hyper politics with no winning in sight for the sensible (most often conservatives but not exclusively) is illustrated, since the GOP effectively has shown up to a old school wild west gun fight armed only with switch blade knifes. That's a loser deal guaranteed. The GOP just does not know how to deal with hook and crook democrats to get anything sensible done - economic or social wise.

To be clear, there is nothing wrong with providing a real world safety net for citizens such that an illness or job loss does not equate to financial disaster. In fact, for the world’s wealthiest nation, providing such a safety net to citizens is not only being socially responsible, it makes for good economic policy as doing so incentives those who simply may have had the carpet pulled from underneath them to get back out there and continue active participation in their own economic journey while contributing to the nation’s GDP.

On the other hand, what the far left democrats are doing here, via this supreme court decision, spells financial upheaval as it incentives far too many people to do little to nothing, become dependent on permanent government subsidizes, freebies, and ultimately social welfare. Sure life can be tough and met with slip and falls; but, good government should never advance the fear of getting back out into the workforce via excessive or permanent government dependency. That is politics – bad politics – from which everyone ultimately suffers – later versus sooner. But in the world of politics and politicians its all about politicians keeping their six figures salaries with all the perks and paying the mortgage for their Mac Mansions – politics first, people last - if ever. That’s the democrat way. Oh but watch with whom you pick as a friend, if its the GOP you might just wind up dead or exiled as a foreigner which is quite the opposite of the victory achieved by the massive wave of unlawful and illegals in the USA these days. And with the democrats hatred and intense acrimony towards ICE, expect this supreme court ruling to lead to a massive increase of illegal and unlawful immigrants into the USA.

Can Khan?

Sure the International Criminal Court prosecutor Khan has his hands busy with a number of sovereignty issues across many countries; but, at least half of such countries are what would clearly be considered as underdeveloped countries. In this case; however, Khan has a dozen or more complaints pertaining to the USA and demonstratively taken no action whatsoever. And there can be no doubt - none whatsoever - that the democrat party of the USA is an international criminal organization. There is no two ways about it. Now this does not imply that the GOP are all saints - not by a long shot - not even close; but, what we have here is concrete absolute proof that the democrat party of the USA has knowingly, intentionally, and willfully used government apparatus (specifically including intelligence agencies) to commit all manners of fraud, insurrection, and the gamut of money crimes to advance its international political agenda.

So why has not a single person been indicted in the USA to date? Not one? And the list is long of corrupt federal judges who have been willful partakers in advancing the democrat party’s international criminal political agenda. From the 9^th circuit (this circuit alleged oversees California which no doubt, on any given day, is ranked as either the #1 or #2 most corrupt state in the USA) chief judge Mary H. Murguia and her Hispanic first pink (keep your eyes on housekeeping staff) entourage to the 2^nd circuit (this circuit allegedly oversees New York which on any given day competes with the state of California for title of the most corrupt state in the USA) chief judge Debra Ann Livingston (who apparently just recently has disappeared from that circuit’s judicial roster, and technically was a conservative of the GOP and head of the extremely corrupt 2nd circuit). What are the dominate finger painting colors of New York? Deep blue and purple+black. Indeed the (USA) as leader of the free world is run and managed by five year finger painting color coded clans

Justice Kagan oversees California at the Supreme Court level. Who appointed Kagan to that seat? President Obama. It might be noted that Kagan prior to being appointed by Obama has no judicial experience, none -- it does not matter though as Kagan can tote the democrat party line in the USA's #1 or #2 most corrupt state in the USA. 

Justice Sonya Sotomayor oversees New York at the Supreme Court level. Who appointed Sotomayor to that seat? President Obama. Are you starting to see any similarities with Kagan and Sotomayor? Justice Sotomayor, runs the most corrupt circuit in the USA. Sotomayor is a well recognized very far left radical liberal Hispanic who enables Blacks and Hispanics in New York to do whatever they want to do. This radical loser judge knows without a doubt that Afircans-Blacks have been embezzling money out of this circuit with fake judgments, and identity theft schemes but has looked the other ways, since per Sotomayor's very far left radical ideology Africans-Blacks are entitled to money laundering and embezzlement activity since the world owes them something. Let's take a closer look at what Sotomayor has to say:

"I join the Court’s opinion in full. I write separately to respond to some of the themes in the principal dissent.  Despite his longstanding endorsement of a “colorblind” Constitution, JUSTICE THOMAS now surprisingly suggests that the Citizenship Clause was a race-conscious remedial measure, relating only to “freed slaves such as Dred Scott,” post, at 56, and those who shared with them certain characteristics, post, at 1 (“no other homeland”); post, at 21 (“called America home”).  It is for this reason, he says, that “children who were born in the United States but [to parents] not domiciled here” are not entitled to claim birthright citizenship. Post, at 3–4. But that narrow vision of the Fourteenth Amendment bears little relationship to the history of its ratification." Justice Sotomayor.

So rather than put forth even a scintilla of fact or evidence in support of Sotomayor's legal wish list, Sotomayor's position is based entirely on attacking her cohort, Justice Thomas, via an alleged inconsistency with Thomas' color blind long standing position as it pertains to the rule of law. Justice Sotomayor is a shining example of President Obama and the democrat party. When the law is not on your side make a spectacle via a strawman argument about race, corral victim allies and deflect away from the fact that Justice Sotomayor has neither the intellect nor ability to even write her own briefs; but, instead employs her law clerk to do the same. In a nutshell, speaking about the relevance of the issues at hand, during the reconstruction area, does not present a legal argument for Sotomayor nor does it present an inconsistency for Thomas as far as race neutral legal ideology is concerned. The fact of the matter is that during that era -  race was a paramount issue due to laws preventing citizenship to Blacks based solely upon race, so for Justice Thomas to speak of the reality of that fact does nothing whatsoever for Justice Sotomayor by way of her argument which we are still anticipating the revelation of Sotomayor's argument with bated breath. This is just a snapshot of the leaders of the American judicial system.

Everywhere in the USA there are these race, ethnicity, and color coded five year old finger painting clans that use government and judicial apparatus to unjustly enrich these groups. Again, so where is prosecutor Khan? Why has no action been taken to date? Has the deep pockets of the Great Imperial reached the doorsteps of the International Criminal Court? At some point, one would begin to ask questions – like now – since a number of the nations which are actively under investigation with indictments issued and arrest warrants perfected have been accused of far less criminal offenses. Maybe this is one of those twilight zone situations. Let us hope that prosecutor Khan is not a democrat...