How are Systemic Human Rights Abuses Shown?
First, all of these dismissals occurred sua sponte, without even a hint of opposition from the adverse party, and in turn were routed to Chinese clerk Yenni Liu. Human rights violations are shown when the court has a visible pattern of conduct the essence of which directly implicates a party's human rights. In this case, appellant has a human right to petition his grievances before a competent non-biased court of jurisdiction to address the merits of the issues presented. The federal 2nd circuit court of appeals refused to do so and refused to do so 15 times. In each case, the circumstances were the same: no opposition paper filed by any adverse party, sua sponte dismissal of the appeal, the failure to issue a published opinion, the failure to address the facts presented, and the immediate reassignment of the appeal to another case manager, in this case Chinese clerk Yenni Liu. All of this activity has been, in large part, via individuals in high positions of power of the Biden Administration. And for what it’s worth the second circuit is overseen by the Justice Sonya Sotomayor, who is a recognized United States Supreme Court far left radical liberal, who cannot or will not even control her own circuit.
This type of behavior is not simply judicial misconduct; but, sounding in criminal misconduct, which would require an extensive criminal investigation. Any such criminal inquiry would have and should have included federal 2nd circuit chief judge Deborah Ann Livingston, given all of which occurred under circuit chief Livingston’s watch. And the lower court judge, which most assuredly should have been a party to a public corruption criminal investigation, is district judge Leshann DeArcy Hall, of the original case before from which the stated three (3) appeals were filed.
The district court docket has shown judge Hall committing very serious violations which even a newcomer magistrate judge in the United States Courts system would have known not to commit. For example, Judge Hall issued a number of what is referred to as ‘Docket Text’ Orders instead of published opinions, which were done to skirt the judicial opinion requirement which is prima facie evidence of bad faith. Even worse, the FBI received tips that Judge Hall was a party to or concealed serious money crimes of African American minorities in her district. And said money crimes were directly related to the case Judge Hall dismissed which was subsequently appealed -- three times. Lastly, judge Hall, who is a President Obama, appointed judge has a well demonstrated record of judicial activism favoring the African American WOKE movement. In a nutshell, this WOKE movement posits that it should not face legal ramifications for certain activity given the history of the USA and is transgressions against African Americans e.g. slavery. The most obvious and glaring question is what is the relationship between this ideology, no matter how true, with the facts and issues before the court? There is no relationship. And this is precisely how and why judicial misconduct coupled with criminal misconduct enters the picture.
What Agency is Responsible for Addressing the Legal Consequences of Judicial Misconduct?
At the end of the day, the United States of America owns this judicial misconduct and public corruption as the GOP not only knows about it; but, their guy, Republican and Chair Jim Jordan, of the House Committee on the Judiciary has failed to take any action, whatsoever, against either of these judges. In fact, Chair Jordan has not done much of anything aside from cheering on President Trump and pushing President Trump’s agenda. Moreover, there is reason to believe that a faction of the GOP via President Trump’s influence orchestrated the entire criminal cover up, which has been ongoing for more than three (3) years. Why? There is evidence to support the position that the FOIA documents, which the government refuses to release (unredacted), is likely very damaging to one or more republican party leaders including President Trump himself. The United States has become the home of problematic political party politics and corruption. That is the new standard.
This is how the United States federal courts operate and, contrary to popular opinion, this type of corruption and seedy federal court behavior did not commence four (4) years ago; conversely, this type of behavior has been ongoing for many decades now. At the same time, this is, perhaps, one of the most illustrative examples. Against this backdrop, the United Nations Human Rights Council was engaged more than fifteen (15) times with respect to this pattern and practice of extreme human rights abuses to appellant’s human rights.
How does such qualify as human rights abuses? Well first, the United States government created the financial destitute poverty situation where it is directly culpable for identity theft and the government’s forced extreme poverty situation spanning more than two (2) years in New York City, NY alone. During that entire time, the federal government via its employees and/or hired actors have been engaging in illegal physical tracking, stalking, and harassment pursuant their disappear criminal cover up schemes which has involved extortion and/or blackmail – both of which are extremely serious federal crimes involving substantial prison sentences.
All of this behavior is well known by the GOP and the United Nations Human Rights Council. And worse even, the United States Congress is well aware of the criminal tactics used, if it, in fact, did not direct the same itself, i.e. 702 FISA PRISM criminal abuses used to spy on individuals. Couple the foregoing with the Federal Communication Commission (“FCC”) being in bed with the federal government to advance a criminal cover up, and you have a situation whereas the United States government is totally illegitimate, on its face, which would seem to require direct intervention by the United Nations Human Rights Council, given the United States Congress is unable or unwilling to address public corruption and criminal activity by the officers/judges/employees of their own courts. This type of abuse of power and public corruption, on its face, demonstrates the type of integrity void of public officials rendering them permanently unfit to serve in any public office in any capacity, in any federal, state, or local capacity.