United States Courts
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
What's Law Got to do With it
, 
Tina Turner once presented the question: What's love got to do with it? To which Legalhotwater, now, asks the question: What's law got to do with it? Apparently nothing. Nothing at all. Especially if it's Google and even more so if it's Woke driven, enabled, backed, and supported by the New York Police Department, and the Northern District of California which is the home of Big Tech.
The Northern District of California loves Big Tech and consequently allows Big Tech to get away with murder, certainly in a figurative manner, and one is left to wonder if not literally, too. This is why 99% of Big Tech's one sided agreements shackling most users, unsuspectingly, are constructed so that no matter what Big Tech does to violate your rights, Big Tech will allege immunity, if you sue them in court. And where will that be, as a matter of law? The Northern District of California federal court. And what happens 99% of the time? Dismissal, at the pleading stage, irrespective of what's cited in the Complaint. Judges know better than what's pleaded in the Complaint to Big Tech's advantage and your disadvantage.
With that in mind, turning to the United States Supreme Court, their expertise was drawn upon to gleen the thoughts of the high court, since it wrote the controlling Opinion. What Opinion?
"the freedom of speech which is secured by the Constitution does not confer an absolute right to speak, without responsibility, whatever one may choose, or an unrestricted and unbridled license giving immunity for every possible use of language and preventing the punishment of those who abuse this freedom; and that a State in the exercise of its police power may punish those who abuse this freedom by utterances inimical to the public welfare, tending to incite to crime, disturb the public peace, or endanger the foundations of organized government and threaten its overthrow by unlawful means, is not open to question. (emphasis added mine). Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 666-668.”
Cited from Supreme Court Opinion: Whitney v. California, 274 US 357 (1927). What were the two principle states involved in that decision? New York and California. What are the two states involved today? New York and California.
So there you have it, the question raised to the Supreme Court, which, again, via it's Opinion, above, authored free speech limits that incite violence; but that was pre-Woke, this is the Woke era, where norms are upside down. Inciting riots and vigilante behavior in the name of Woke or far left ideology is ok, yet simple disagreement with Woke or far keft ideology will likely get you banned or restricted on Google, Facebook, Instagram, Discord, 'X' formerly Twitter, and anywhere else Big Tech unilaterally decides legitimate free speech is unacceptable because it does not comport with their narratives and the green light bestowed upon Big Tech by the Northern District of California.
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
Your Contributions
For those of you who have been patrons of the public service Legalhotwater provides, you probably, already, know that this public service is provided free of charge. And there have been quite a few hot button issues that Legalhotwater has exposed, in pursuit of keeping the public informed as to the activities of its government. Legal actions are expensive and time consuming. We encourage you to embark upon this opportunity to help, as your contributions: no matter how large or small go a long way in terms of recouping costs and ensuring the availability of resources to continue our work. Please consider supporting our work, today, via CashApp per the following QR link.
CIA Freedom of Information Act Denial Relationship to Meta
Here is the CIA FOIA Denial letter as promised per the video.
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
USA Corrupt Cover Ups Status Quo
If a picture is worth a thousand words, how much are three pictures worth? And what story do the three pictures tell?
These corrupt United States Courts have a persisent pattern and practice of a rigging court cases (courtesy of the shadow docket mechanism), fraud, embezzlement, and political party centric criminal cover ups.
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
Pattern and Practice of Corruption
Widespread Corruption Rules United States Courts, far beyond simply assuming the status of Kangaroo Courts. The United States has become the de facto home for extremely egregious human rights violations coupled with its latest title of home to the fastest rise in cybercrimes much of which is originating in the federal government itself.
The backdrop of this current appeals court issue is with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed back in July of 2021. At no point did the government every release a single piece of paper relative to the FOIA action. This is now at least the third time this case has been in the federal court of appeals for the second circuit which is situated in New York, NY. None of the issues ever raised in the second circuit court were ever addressed. Not one. In fact, this latest instance, like its predecessors, did not even involve a single affirmative paper being filed, in the appeals court, by the defendant i.e. The Department of Justice. And in each instance, in the appeals court, the case was dismissed and immediately reassigned to a Chinese clerk by the name of Yenni Liu. Documents are illustrative of this corruption. Be sure to read the second set of documents on the next page.
Read On.
United States Home of Systemic Human Rights Abuses
Again, all of these dismissals arose without even a hint of opposition from the adverse party have been routed to the Chinese clerk Yenni Liu. Appellant has no involvement with these corrupt Asians and Chinese, in particular, in this appeals court who are aligned with the far left wing WOKE Blacks. All of this activity is driven, in large part, via individuals in high positions of power of the Biden Administration. And for what it’s worth the second circuit is overseen by the Justice Sonya Sotomayor, another far left radical liberal, who cannot or will not even control her own circuit. Not only does this criminal behavior require an extensive criminal investigation, there simply is no justifiable reason why circuit chief judge Deborah Ann Livingston is not a party to a criminal investigation and likewise removed from the bench, as should be the case with Leshann DeArcy Hall, who is the lower court district judge. And the lower court docket already has judge Hall on the record committing very serious violations which even the least intelligent judge in the entire United States Courts system would have known not to commit. To mask Judge Hall’s corruption and civil misconduct she issued a serious of docket text Orders to get her ‘Brothas’ and Caucasian bosses off the hook, as part of their cover up with respect to the FOIA documents themselves. Thus, Black judge Leshann DeArcy Hall, several times now, has committed criminal acts to protect the adverse party with which she has some sort of relationship or otherwise favors because of their race.
The fact that lower court Black judge Leshann DeArcy Hall is a subject to one or more judicial misconduct complaints cannot denied. Incidentally, so too is circuit chief judge Deborah Ann Livingston. At the end of the day the United States of America owns this corruption and cover up as the GOP not only knows about it; but, their guy, Chair Jim Jordan, of the House Committee on the Judiciary has failed to take any action against either of these judges. In fact, Chair Jordan has not done much of anything aside from cheering on President Trump and pushing that agenda. Moreover, there is reason to believe that a faction of the GOP orchestrated the entire criminal cover up, which has been ongoing for more than three (3) years, because the FOIA documents which the government refuses to release because such is likely damaging to one or more members of their party. The United States has become the home of problematic party politics and corruption. That is the new standard.
This is how the United States government operates and contrary to popular opinion this type of corruption and seedy government behavior did not commence four years ago, conversely, it has been ongoing for many decades now. At the same time, this is, perhaps, one of the most illustrative examples. The United Nations was engaged more than fifteen (15) times with respect to this pattern and practice of extreme human rights abuses.
How does such qualify as human rights abuses? Well first, the United States government, which is entirely wayward, created the financial destitute poverty situation where it is directly responsible for identity theft and a forced extreme poverty situation spanning more than two (2) years in New York City, NY alone. During the entire time the federal government via its employees and/or hired actors have been engaging in illegal physical tracking, stalking, and harassment pursuant their disappear criminal cover up schemes which involves extortion and/or blackmail both of which are extremely serious federal crimes involving significant prison sentences.
In any event, the basis of the corruption is to disrupt ones identity, interfere with all financial activity and transactions, enforce suppression, oppression, and cover ups via poverty, all the while using their actors/employees, ante, to advance a disappear scheme. All of this is known by the GOP and the United Nations. And worse even, the United States Congress is well aware of the criminal tactics used, if it did not direct the same itself, i.e. 702 FISA PRISM criminal abuses used to spy on individuals. Couple that with the FCC being in bed with the federal government to advance a criminal cover up, and you have a situation whereas the United States government is totally sideways, on its face, which would seem to require direct intervention by the United Nations given the United States Congress is unable or unwilling to address the corruption in their own courts. This type of abuse of power and corruption, on its face, demonstrates the type of cowardice of public officials who will do just about anything to keep an unwitting public believing this broken pillar of the United States is actually an authentic court system of law. It is not.