United States Courts
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
Circus Circus
Contrary to popular opinion, the greatest show on earth is not the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus, it is the United States federal court system. This court system is so far gone, so entrenched with systemic corruption, so overrun with race politics, so engulfed in weaponization of its intelilgence agencies against the public, so overrun with slavery politics and retribution, related thereto, that, clearly, said courts do not remotely resemble the characteristics nor tenets of its origin.
Federal judges are completely out of control with judicial misconduct and corruption at all time highs, a Congress whose knee jerk reaction to addressing a rogue court system is to hide the true colors of the greatest show on earth, from the world, via an elaborate labyrinth of criminal covers, domestic & international espionage, and bordering countries eager to cash in from the big cash register in the sky i.e. the deep pockets of the USA government. Strangely enough, perhaps the pertinent question that should be considered is when will the guaranteed payoffs end and instead convert into judgment proof parcels of paper considering the USA government is $37+ trillion dollars in debt and counting – with no black ink in sight.
The Red Coats Revival
Oh well, fret not – the United Nations is there to act as the adult in room, yes? Nope. The United Nations and its Black WOKE slavery reparations agenda, which has touch-points across the globe, is the prime player-instigator in the problem with the United States courts. The reality is that neither the greatest show on earth, the United Nation, nor much of Europe has any interest in dealing with court facts, evidence, and legal issues from an overarching standpoint. Today, it’s all about hand-washing politics, keeping people in power (and of course their mistresses paid, and concubines great in number, as is the depth of their bank accounts), all while oppressing the little guy via multi trillion dollar budgets, artificial intelligence [government] computer systems, and a wide network of Black & White driven social engineered ransom (ware) – in other words, anything to put a dollar (United States dollar preferably) in one’s pocket. The irony is that the ways of Caucasian leaders in the United States is what got them in the social, political, debt mess in which they are, now, engulfed. Such would generally expect the foregoing to be the impetus for change. It is not. At least not in any tangible substantive way, except that Caucasian American leaders are all, now, apostles and disciples when the tables have turned on them. Of course, the answer is not large scale violence either; but then neither is passivity, evasiveness, and assuming the ostrich position – among a consortium of possible solutions.
The fact of the matter is that the United States and its courts have a great deal of skeletons in the closest which will only be dealt with, in any meaningful way, via effective leadership willing to tackle these discomforting gut wrenching issues in an honest, fair, empathetic, and path forward manner. Currently, that is not the case. Instead the United States, its federal courts, and its neighboring country allies are all more than willing to look the other way with respect to systemic human rights violations, and even more so if doing so means contributing to the retirement account of wayward politicians eager to cash in.
As to the federal courts, which once were considered the icon and model for the state courts, such are, now, laughing stocks of corruption, cover ups via rogue judges and black woke politics. And to the extent, one believes that whites are not cashing in on this rich wave, that would be a fallacy and mistake. Take the federal second circuit court of appeals which sits in New York City which, also, has a presence via the United Nations, this court is the most corrupt court system on the east coast, hands down. As a regular course of business, this court blocks the filing of papers, allows left wing radical court clerks to act ultra vires, dispatches bench driven political [criminal] cover ups whenever this [far] left wing radical court does not want to address the dirt before it, and so on – you get the picture – no doubt.
At some point one has to wonder is this Deja Vu or a role reversal kind of thing or what? Like weren’t the Red Coats accused of doing everything the United States is now doing, which prompted the Revolutionary War?
What is the relevant adage here?
He whose ego is too large to recall his history is destined to repeat it.
Carry on folks; but be sure to take a look below at why this dirty court is engaging in criminal malfeasance.
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
Your Contributions
For those of you who have been patrons of the public service Legalhotwater provides, you probably, already, know that this public service is provided free of charge. And there have been quite a few hot button issues that Legalhotwater has exposed, in pursuit of keeping the public informed as to the activities of its government. Legal actions are expensive and time consuming. We encourage you to embark upon this opportunity to help, as your contributions: no matter how large or small go a long way in terms of recouping costs and ensuring the availability of resources to continue our work. Please consider supporting our work, today, via CashApp per the following QR link.
CIA Freedom of Information Act Denial Relationship to Meta
Here is the CIA FOIA Denial letter as promised per the video.
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
What's Law Got to do With it
, 
Tina Turner once presented the question: What's love got to do with it? To which Legalhotwater, now, asks the question: What's law got to do with it? Apparently nothing. Nothing at all. Especially if it's Google and even more so if it's Woke driven, enabled, backed, and supported by the New York Police Department, and the Northern District of California which is the home of Big Tech.
The Northern District of California loves Big Tech and consequently allows Big Tech to get away with murder, certainly in a figurative manner, and one is left to wonder if not literally, too. This is why 99% of Big Tech's one sided agreements shackling most users, unsuspectingly, are constructed so that no matter what Big Tech does to violate your rights, Big Tech will allege immunity, if you sue them in court. And where will that be, as a matter of law? The Northern District of California federal court. And what happens 99% of the time? Dismissal, at the pleading stage, irrespective of what's cited in the Complaint. Judges know better than what's pleaded in the Complaint to Big Tech's advantage and your disadvantage.
With that in mind, turning to the United States Supreme Court, their expertise was drawn upon to gleen the thoughts of the high court, since it wrote the controlling Opinion. What Opinion?
"the freedom of speech which is secured by the Constitution does not confer an absolute right to speak, without responsibility, whatever one may choose, or an unrestricted and unbridled license giving immunity for every possible use of language and preventing the punishment of those who abuse this freedom; and that a State in the exercise of its police power may punish those who abuse this freedom by utterances inimical to the public welfare, tending to incite to crime, disturb the public peace, or endanger the foundations of organized government and threaten its overthrow by unlawful means, is not open to question. (emphasis added mine). Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 666-668.”
Cited from Supreme Court Opinion: Whitney v. California, 274 US 357 (1927). What were the two principle states involved in that decision? New York and California. What are the two states involved today? New York and California.
So there you have it, the question raised to the Supreme Court, which, again, via it's Opinion, above, authored free speech limits that incite violence; but that was pre-Woke, this is the Woke era, where norms are upside down. Inciting riots and vigilante behavior in the name of Woke or far left ideology is ok, yet simple disagreement with Woke or far keft ideology will likely get you banned or restricted on Google, Facebook, Instagram, Discord, 'X' formerly Twitter, and anywhere else Big Tech unilaterally decides legitimate free speech is unacceptable because it does not comport with their narratives and the green light bestowed upon Big Tech by the Northern District of California.
- Details
- Category: United States Courts
USA Corrupt Cover Ups Status Quo
If a picture is worth a thousand words, how much are three pictures worth? And what story do the three pictures tell?
These corrupt United States Courts have a persistent pattern and practice of a rigging court cases (courtesy of the shadow docket mechanism), fraud, embezzlement, and political party centric criminal cover ups.
