The Role of Gaslighting in Public Office Abuse of Power

Gaslighting techniques

The role of gaslighting is quite simple. Gaslighting is a form of manipulation, almost always involved with some type of criminal activity, which the actors seek to cover up. At its core, what the actors seek to do is make that which has been publicly presented or exposed appear as unreal or a fiction of one's imagination. Gaslighting often involves social engineered manipulation, fraud, criminal activity and the desire to make those who reveal or expose certain truths, go away.

The traits of Gaslighting Often Include:

1. The actors or attackers almost always deny events.
2. The actors or attackers persist with denying events even when confronted with evidence.
3. The actors or attackers insist that your reality is skewed.
4. The actors or attackers typically insist that the events at issue never actually happened.
5. The actors or attackers almost are always defensive and state the other person is overreacting.
6. The actors or attackers almost always persistently change the subject when confronted on the issues.

Nothing New Under the Sun

The role of gaslighting in public corruption and abuse of power is central to its objective(s). And this type of corrupt motive behavior is by no means new. In fact, such abuse of power techniques have been around since the birth of man himself. What is different today are the techniques used to push or advance public corruption, to which gaslighting plays a pivotal role in doing so. The use of internet "Internet and Digital Advertisements," "Streaming Content Ads," or "Video Commercial Ads"  which are doctored, coupled with gaslighting, collectively, seek to advance some type of agenda. The most common use of the foregoing is to use Ads to cyber-stalk i.e. one way statements interlaced with Ads (Adware), and content injection. All of the foregoing is predicated on unlawful and criminal internet tracking, which is a very serious crime under several federal and state statutes in conjunction with the Federal Communications Commission regulations. The kicker is that no matter how serious a statute is written, it only matters if such offenses (especially intentional) are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. And with respect to content injection, this techniques 100% of the time involves government actors or attackers leveraging unlawful internet tracking to real-time inject manipulated, contrived, and seemingly authentic looking content i.e. deep fakes, into the victim's internet data stream thereby making the victim believe that the disguised content is actually the original unaltered, unmodified, undistorted, content of a website host.

For example, one of the techniques corrupt government entities such as the Department of Justice uses is the injection of modified software into designated locations whom the victim and the public trusts, thereby eliminating suspicion. Say for example one wants to download a Windows Operating System upgrade which, these days, is done entirely online, the victim would navigate to the Windows website and initiate the download believing they are downloading the true and correct version of windows but in reality end up downloading what is equivalent to a Trojan download of the intended Windows upgrade or whatever software or other digital media. This is almost always achieved via the government abuse of computer resources, i.e. quantum computers. Since year 2020 these types of techniques have increased dramatically under this current Washington administration. Moreover, you may have heard of these techniques collectively referred to by one or more government officials as "Weaponization" of government against targeted members of the public. And as stated, ante, this type of "Weaponization" of government is to preclude exposure of criminal and/or civil misconduct and violations.

If any of this sounds familiar, to what you experienced, there is a very good chance you have been a target of “Weaponization” by government involving some type of criminal/civil behavior that would land one or more of them in prison. This is especially true given the role of gaslighting in today's politics of governing -- using new techniques to advance age-old objectives -- absolute power and control. And if that is not bad enough, all of these techniques and activities violate both the 4th and 5th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Should the state government be involved, the 11th Amendment is, also, violated. Several online private entities engage in gaslighting on behalf of federal (and state) government entities, which can be both criminal and/or civil violations depending upon the content and depth of the violations. Such websites allegedly involved in said behavior i.e. the use of Adware is very broad in spectrum; but, some of the usual suspects allegedly include The New York Post, CNN, The USA Today, and The New York Times to name only a few.